Page 1 (Programs)
/programs/governance-weight-equity
Hero (#top)
H1: Governance Weight Equity Model (MEST-PEM)
Lead: An auditable governance-weight model grounded in mass–energy vs spacetime structural tensors. MEST-PEM decomposes governance weight into Leadership Weight (ME structure) and Public Weight (ST structure), then uses conservation-style rebalancing, anti-capture guardrails, and correction mechanisms to support fairness, stability, and accountability.
Primary CTA: See the research framework & falsifiable claims → /research/mest-pem
Secondary CTA: Apply for a pilot / Join independent review → /get-involved/governance-pilot
Trust line: Rules first · Controls required · No trading · Publish failure boundaries
System Nav Bar (insert global nav bar here)

Three Core Cards (Value Proposition)
Card 1 — Two governance weights (ME vs ST)
• Leadership Weight (ME structure): execution capacity, resource coordination, crisis response, delivery and compliance
• Public Weight (ST structure): participation, oversight, correction, legitimacy, long-run stability
Card 2 — Conservation & rebalancing (not mechanical 50/50)
• A “structure budget” is allocated across the two sides and periodically rebalanced
• Equity is defined as functional parity (execution + correction), not equal shares by default
Card 3 — Anti-capture guardrails
• Not tradable (not a security)
• Time-decay and rotation incentives
• Dual-key thresholds for major actions
• Transparent audit trail + independent review

Methods Block (#methods)
How we implement MEST-PEM (program-level overview):
1. Operational definitions: convert “rights/weights” into auditable definitions and metrics
2. Controls by design: benchmark against “status quo”, “slogan-only”, and “reward-only” baselines
3. Pilot first: validate in bounded settings (e.g., enterprise governance) before broader claims
4. Publish results: release evaluation reports including negative findings and failure boundaries
Cross-links:
• Macro principles (FRM): /programs/fair-rights-mechanism
• Meso pilots (Consumption Equity): /programs/consumption-equity
• Micro engine (MEST-CEM): /research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem

Latest Updates (#updates)
• Update 1: MEST-PEM v0.1 released (definitions + metrics + guardrails)
• Update 2: “Governance Weight Diagnostics” pilot intake opened (no benefit claims)
• Update 3: Independent reviewer checklist published (controls + falsifiability)

CTA Block (#cta)
Title: Make governance more auditable, correctable, and resilient to capture
• Read the research page → /research/mest-pem
• Apply for a pilot → /get-involved/governance-pilot#pilot-form
• Join independent review → /get-involved/governance-pilot#reviewer-form
Footer disclaimer:
“Governance weight” (a.k.a. “power-share”) is a research concept, not a financial security; it is non-tradable and does not imply any profit or legal entitlement.


Page 2 (Research)
/research/mest-pem
Hero (#top)
H1: MEST-PEM: Governance Weight Equity Model (a.k.a. “Power-Share Equity”)
Lead: MEST-PEM uses a mass–energy vs spacetime tensor decomposition to formalize governance weight as two interacting structures:
𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
(leadership/execution) and
𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
(public participation/oversight). The model is evaluated through auditable metrics, explicit controls, and falsifiable predictions.
Primary CTA: Jump to falsifiability & failure boundaries → #falsifiability
Secondary CTA: Pilot & data requirements → /get-involved/governance-pilot
Trust line: Definitions → controls → sensitivity → failure boundaries (required)
System Nav Bar (insert global nav bar here)

Three Research Summary Cards
Card 1 — Structural conservation backbone
𝑇
𝐺
=
𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
+
𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
Interpretation: a total governance “structure budget” is allocated and rebalanced across the two sides to prevent permanent one-sided dominance.
Card 2 — Functional equity, not share equality
Equity is defined as long-run functional parity: execution effectiveness must be matched by oversight/correction legitimacy—rather than fixed 50/50 shares.
Card 3 — Guardrails are part of the model
Non-tradability, time-decay, dual-key thresholds, transparent logs, and independent review are mandatory components—not optional add-ons.

Methods Block (#methods)
1) Definitions & mapping (#definitions)
• 𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
: Leadership Weight tensor (auditable proxies for execution capacity and accountable delivery)
• 𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
: Public Weight tensor (auditable proxies for participation, oversight, correction, legitimacy)
• 𝑇
𝐺
: total governance structure tensor (the overall “weight budget”)
2) Metrics (#metrics)
• RCI — Rights/Power Concentration Index
• TTS — Transparency & Traceability Score
• CE — Correction Efficiency (appeals resolution speed; correction rate)
• EE — Execution Effectiveness (delivery/compliance proxies)
• PBS — Baseline Protections Score (minimum rights protections)
• AMI — Access & Mobility Index (reachability for non-elites)
3) Controls & sensitivity (#controls)
Minimum control baselines:
• Status quo (no mechanism change)
• Slogan-only (statements without audits/constraints)
• Reward-only (benefits without governance-weight design)
Sensitivity checks:
• time windows, external shocks, metric definition changes, selection bias, confounders

Falsifiability & Failure Boundaries (#falsifiability)
MEST-PEM must satisfy falsifiable outcomes relative to controls; otherwise we publish a failure boundary:
1. With caps + rebalancing + decay, RCI long-run growth declines vs controls.
2. CE improves without a material drop in EE (avoid “more oversight but paralysis”).
3. Dual-key thresholds reduce extreme decisions under shock periods (backtests or prospective tests).
4. TTS increases while AMI does not decrease (avoid “transparent but unreachable”).
5. Explicit failure boundary: the model is not valid in environments lacking auditability or enforceable correction pathways; we publish why.

Linkages (Macro → Meso → Micro) (#linkages)
MEST-PEM is designed to be tested in bounded environments before generalization:
• Macro principles (FRM): /programs/fair-rights-mechanism
• Meso pilots (Consumption Equity): /programs/consumption-equity
• Micro audit engine (MEST-CEM): /research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem
MEST-PEM extends the same ME/ST decomposition from enterprise settings to governance-weight allocation, while adopting ARF-style controls and reproducibility norms.

Latest Updates (#updates)
• v0.1: Definitions + metrics released
• v0.2: Anti-capture guardrails added (decay, dual-key, transparent logs)
• v0.3: Pilot data dictionary + report template published

CTA Block (#cta)
• Apply for a pilot → /get-involved/governance-pilot#pilot-form
• Join independent review → /get-involved/governance-pilot#reviewer-form
• See the enterprise pilot track (CEM) → /programs/consumption-equity
Footer disclaimer:
MEST-PEM is research and mechanism design, not legal advice; it is non-tradable and does not promise benefits or entitlements.


Page 3 (Get Involved)
/get-involved/governance-pilot
Hero (#top)
H1: Get Involved: Governance Weight Diagnostics & Independent Review (MEST-PEM)
Lead: Participate as a pilot partner, data contributor, or independent reviewer. We provide protocol templates, control designs, and auditable evaluation reports, with support for anonymized publication (including negative results).
Primary CTA: Apply as a pilot partner → #pilot-form
Secondary CTA: Join as an independent reviewer → #reviewer-form
Trust line: Compliance-first · Aggregated data by default · Reviewable reports
System Nav Bar (insert global nav bar here)

Three Participation Cards
Card 1 — Pilot partners (organizations)
Bounded scope and audit-ready logs preferred; start with diagnostics before mechanism changes.
Card 2 — Data contributors
Public or anonymized aggregated datasets + data dictionary; replication and baseline comparisons encouraged.
Card 3 — Independent reviewers
Review definitions, controls, guardrails, and misinterpretation risks; help produce publishable, neutral language.

Methods Block (#methods)
What pilot partners receive
• Earn/Allocate/Exercise template (customizable)
• Metric dashboard specification (RCI/TTS/CE/EE/PBS/AMI)
• Control + sensitivity evaluation design
• Report template (including failure boundaries)
What pilot partners provide (minimal-by-default)
• governance rules and decision logs
• aggregated metrics (no personal identifiers by default)
• pilot window (recommended: 8–12 weeks)
• publication preference (anonymized / internal only)

Latest Updates (#updates)
• Pilot application form + data dictionary v0.1 released
• Reviewer checklist v0.1 released
• Anonymized report template v0.1 released

Forms (Implementation Spec)
Pilot partner application (#pilot-form)
• Organization name
• Website
• Country/jurisdiction
• Setting (enterprise / nonprofit / community / other)
• Scope boundary (what decisions are in-scope)
• Available logs/metrics (checkboxes)
• Duration preference (8–12 weeks)
• Publication preference (anonymized / internal only)
• Contact name + email
• Notes/constraints
Data contribution (#data-form)
• Dataset name
• Source/link
• Data type (public / aggregated)
• Time window
• Variable list
• License/permission statement
• Contact email
Independent reviewer (#reviewer-form)
• Name
• Expertise area
• Availability (hours/month)
• Conflict-of-interest statement
• Contact email

CTA Block (#cta)
• Read falsifiable predictions → /research/mest-pem#falsifiability
• See the meso pilot track (CEM) → /programs/consumption-equity
• See the micro engine (MEST-CEM) → /research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem
Footer disclaimer:
“Governance weight / power-share” is a non-tradable research construct, not a security; participation does not imply any profit, entitlement, or legal right.

Optional “Short Label” (for menus)
• Programs: Governance Weight Equity (MEST-PEM)
• Research: MEST-PEM Model
• Get Involved: Governance Pilot
Page 1（Programs）
/programs/governance-weight-equity
Hero（#top）
H1： 治理权重平权模型（MEST-PEM）
一句话导语： 用“质能—时空结构张量守恒”的思想，将治理权重分解为**领导权重（质能）与群众权重（时空）**两类结构，并用可审计指标、反俘获护栏与纠错机制，实现公平、稳定、可复核的治理配置。
主 CTA： 查看研究与可证伪命题 → /research/mest-pem
次 CTA： 申请试点 / 加入独立审阅 → /get-involved/governance-pilot
可信度说明： 规则先行 · 对照必设 · 不承诺收益 · 允许发布失败边界
体系导航条（如上统一条）

三张卡片（核心价值主张）
卡片 1：两类治理权重（ME vs ST）
• 领导权重（质能结构）：强调执行力、资源调度、危机响应、制度落地
• 群众权重（时空结构）：强调参与、监督、纠错、合法性与长期稳定
卡片 2：守恒与再平衡（不追求机械 50/50）
• 总结构守恒：治理权重在两侧之间分配与再平衡
• 平权目标是“功能等价”：执行有效性与纠错合法性长期匹配
卡片 3：反俘获护栏（长期公平的关键）
• 权重不可买卖
• 权重随时间衰减（轮换与更新）
• 重大事项双钥机制（两侧阈值同时满足）
• 透明账本与独立审阅

Methods 区块（#methods）
我们如何做（项目级概览）：
1. 定义口径：把“权利/权重”变成可审计的指标与规则
2. 建立对照：与“现状机制/口号机制/奖励机制”对照
3. 试点验证：优先在企业治理等边界清晰场景验证
4. 发布报告：公开评估与失败边界，形成可迭代版本
交叉链接：
• 宏观原则：FRM → /programs/fair-rights-mechanism
• 中观试点：Consumption Equity → /programs/consumption-equity
• 微观引擎：MEST-CEM → /research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem

Latest Updates（#updates）
• 更新 1：发布 MEST-PEM v0.1（定义 + 指标 + 护栏）
• 更新 2：开放“治理权重结构诊断”试点申请（不涉及收益承诺）
• 更新 3：发布独立审阅清单（对照与可证伪要求）

CTA 区块（#cta）
标题： 让治理更可审计、更可纠错、更能防俘获
• 查看研究页（公式、指标、命题）→ /research/mest-pem
• 申请试点（组织/企业/非营利）→ /get-involved/governance-pilot#pilot-form
• 加入独立审阅 → /get-involved/governance-pilot#reviewer-form
页脚免责声明：
“治理权重”是研究概念，不是证券；不可买卖；不构成法律建议。


Page 2（Research）
/research/mest-pem
Hero（#top）
H1： MEST-PEM：治理权重平权模型（权力股平权模型）
导语： 用质能—时空结构张量守恒，将治理权重拆分为
𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
（领导/执行结构）与
𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
（群众/监督结构），并以可审计指标、对照模型与可证伪命题检验“平权机制是否有效”。
主 CTA： 查看可证伪命题 → #falsifiability
次 CTA： 试点与数据规范 → /get-involved/governance-pilot
可信度说明： 定义—对照—敏感性—失败边界 必备
体系导航条（同上统一条）

三张卡片（研究摘要）
卡片 1：结构守恒骨架
𝑇
𝐺
=
𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
+
𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
含义：治理“总结构预算”在两侧分配与再平衡，防止单侧长期固化。
卡片 2：功能平权而非份额平权
平权目标：长期尺度上，执行有效性与纠错合法性在系统目标中贡献相当，而非机械 50/50。
卡片 3：护栏是模型的一部分
不可买卖、时间衰减、双钥阈值、透明账本、独立审阅，缺一不可。

Methods 区块（#methods）
1) 定义与映射（#definitions）
• 𝑇
𝑀
𝐸
：领导权重（执行与资源调度能力的结构代理）
• 𝑇
𝑆
𝑇
：群众权重（参与、监督、纠错与合法性结构代理）
• 𝑇
𝐺
：治理总结构张量（制度总权重预算）
2) 指标体系（#metrics）
• 权力集中度指数 RCI
• 透明度与可追溯评分 TTS
• 纠错效率 CE
• 执行有效性 EE
• 底线权利保护 PBS
• 可达性与流动性 AMI
3) 对照与敏感性（#controls）
对照组至少包含：
• 现状对照（不改变机制）
• 口号对照（无审计规则）
• 奖励对照（只奖励不赋权）
敏感性测试：时间窗、外部冲击、指标口径变化、选择偏差等。

可证伪命题（#falsifiability）
至少满足以下命题之一，否则判定机制失败或不适用（需发布失败边界）：
1. 引入上限+再平衡+衰减后，RCI 长期增速显著下降（相对对照）。
2. CE 提升且 EE 不显著下降（避免“纠错更强但治理瘫痪”）。
3. 双钥机制降低极端决策概率（回溯或前瞻检验）。
4. TTS 提升同时 AMI 不下降（避免“透明但不可达”）。
5. 给出明确失败边界：在哪些数据不透明/不可审计场景不成立，并解释原因。

与 CEM / MEST-CEM 的交叉链接（#linkages）
这不是孤立模型：
• FRM 提供宏观原则与护栏：/programs/fair-rights-mechanism
• CEM 提供可控的企业治理试点：/programs/consumption-equity
• MEST-CEM 提供微观可审计分解引擎：/research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem
MEST-PEM 将同一 ME/ST 分解思想扩展到治理权重配置，并复用 ARF 的“对照—审计—可证伪”规范。

Latest Updates（#updates）
• v0.1：定义与指标发布
• v0.2：增加反俘获护栏（衰减、双钥、透明账本）
• v0.3：加入试点数据字典与报告模板

CTA 区块（#cta）
• 申请试点 → /get-involved/governance-pilot#pilot-form
• 加入独立审阅 → /get-involved/governance-pilot#reviewer-form
• 查看企业试点（CEM） → /programs/consumption-equity


Page 3（Get involved）
/get-involved/governance-pilot
Hero（#top）
H1： 参与试点：治理权重结构诊断与独立审阅（MEST-PEM）
导语： 你可以作为试点伙伴、数据贡献者或独立审阅者加入。我们提供协议模板、对照设计与评估报告，并支持匿名发布研究结论（包括负结果）。
主 CTA： 申请试点伙伴 → #pilot-form
次 CTA： 加入独立审阅 → #reviewer-form
可信度说明： 合规优先 · 默认汇总数据 · 可复核报告
体系导航条（同上统一条）

三张卡片（参与路径）
卡片 1：试点伙伴（组织/企业/非营利）
边界清晰、可审计日志优先；先做“结构诊断”，再考虑机制调整。
卡片 2：数据贡献者
提供公开或匿名汇总数据 + 数据字典；支持复现与对照。
卡片 3：独立审阅者
审阅定义、对照、护栏与误解风险；帮助形成可公开版本。

Methods 区块（#methods）
试点伙伴将获得
• Earn/Allocate/Exercise 机制模板（可裁剪）
• 指标面板规范（RCI/TTS/CE/EE/PBS/AMI）
• 对照与敏感性分析设计
• 评估报告模板（含失败边界）
试点伙伴需提供（默认最小化）
• 规则文本与决策日志
• 汇总指标（默认不含个人可识别信息）
• 试点窗口（建议 8–12 周）
• 发布偏好（匿名/内部）

Latest Updates（#updates）
• 发布试点申请表与数据字典 v0.1
• 发布审阅者检查清单 v0.1
• 发布匿名报告模板 v0.1

表单（工程规范）
试点伙伴申请（#pilot-form）
• 组织名称
• 官网
• 国家/司法辖区
• 场景（企业/非营利/社区/其他）
• 试点范围（边界说明）
• 可提供的日志/指标（复选）
• 试点周期（8–12 周）
• 发布偏好（匿名发布/仅内部）
• 联系人姓名与邮箱
• 备注
数据贡献（#data-form）
• 数据集名称
• 来源/链接
• 数据类型（公开/匿名汇总）
• 时间窗口
• 变量列表
• 授权/许可声明
• 联系邮箱
独立审阅者（#reviewer-form）
• 姓名
• 专长领域
• 可投入时间（小时/月）
• 利益冲突声明
• 联系邮箱

CTA 区块（#cta）
• 查看研究页（可证伪命题） → /research/mest-pem#falsifiability
• 查看企业治理试点（CEM） → /programs/consumption-equity
• 查看微观模型（MEST-CEM） → /research/consumption-equity-model#mest-cem
页脚免责声明：
“治理权重/权力股”为研究概念，非证券、不可买卖；不构成法律建议或任何收益承诺。
You said:
please generate the SEO Title / Meta Description / OG snippets for all three pages in English to make them immediately deployable in your CMS. thanks!
Copy
Edit message
ChatGPT said:
Below are copy-paste ready SEO fields for all three pages (SEO Title, Meta Description, and Open Graph snippets). I’m assuming your site brand is AEEA (Avoid Earth Extinction Association); replace “AEEA” if you prefer another label.
I’m keeping titles within typical best practice ranges and meta descriptions concise while still specific. OG descriptions largely mirror meta descriptions but are slightly more “share-friendly.”

1) Programs Page
URL: /programs/governance-weight-equity
Page Name: Governance Weight Equity Model (MEST-PEM)
SEO Title
Governance Weight Equity Model (MEST-PEM) | AEEA Programs
Meta Description
MEST-PEM is an auditable governance-weight model that balances leadership execution and public oversight using ME/ST structural tensors, anti-capture guardrails, and correction mechanisms—pilot-ready and falsifiable.
Open Graph Snippets
og:title
Governance Weight Equity Model (MEST-PEM)
og:description
An auditable governance-weight model balancing leadership execution and public oversight with anti-capture guardrails, correction pathways, and pilot-first validation.
og:type
website
og:url
https://aeea.net/programs/governance-weight-equity
og:site_name
AEEA
og:image (recommended)
https://aeea.net/assets/og/mest-pem-programs.png
og:image:alt
Governance Weight Equity Model (MEST-PEM) — AEEA Programs

2) Research Page
URL: /research/mest-pem
Page Name: MEST-PEM Research Framework
SEO Title
MEST-PEM Research: Auditable Governance Weights & Falsifiable Tests | AEEA
Meta Description
Research framework for MEST-PEM: definitions of leadership vs public weight tensors, metrics (RCI, TTS, CE, EE), control baselines, sensitivity analysis, and falsifiable predictions with failure boundaries.
Open Graph Snippets
og:title
MEST-PEM Research Framework
og:description
Definitions, metrics, controls, and falsifiable predictions for governance-weight equity—designed for independent replication and transparent failure boundaries.
og:type
article
og:url
https://aeea.net/research/mest-pem
og:site_name
AEEA
og:image (recommended)
https://aeea.net/assets/og/mest-pem-research.png
og:image:alt
MEST-PEM Research Framework — metrics, controls, falsifiable tests

3) Get Involved Page
URL: /get-involved/governance-pilot
Page Name: Governance Pilot & Independent Review
SEO Title
Join a Governance Pilot or Independent Review (MEST-PEM) | AEEA
Meta Description
Apply as a pilot partner, data contributor, or independent reviewer for MEST-PEM. Access templates, control designs, and auditable reporting with anonymized publication options—including negative results.
Open Graph Snippets
og:title
Get Involved: Governance Pilot & Independent Review (MEST-PEM)
og:description
Participate as a pilot partner, data contributor, or independent reviewer. We provide templates, control designs, and auditable reports—anonymized publication supported.
og:type
website
og:url
https://aeea.net/get-involved/governance-pilot
og:site_name
AEEA
og:image (recommended)
https://aeea.net/assets/og/mest-pem-get-involved.png
og:image:alt
Get Involved with MEST-PEM — pilot partners, data contributors, independent reviewers

Optional: Twitter/X Cards (highly recommended)
If your CMS supports it, add these for all three pages:
twitter:card
summary_large_image
twitter:site
@AEEA (replace if applicable)
twitter:title
(use the same as og:title)
twitter:description
(use the same as og:description)
twitter:image
(use the same as og:image)

Notes on OG images (quick guidance)
• Ideal size: 1200 × 630
• Keep text minimal; prioritize a strong visual + short title
• Use consistent naming: mest-pem-programs.png, mest-pem-research.png, mest-pem-get-involved.png
If you tell me what CMS you’re using (WordPress, Webflow, Next.js, etc.), I can format these as a ready-to-paste block (e.g., Yoast fields, Webflow SEO panel, or HTML <meta> tags).